No Inside Voice? Its Impact on Memory is Revealed in a New Study

Summary: A innovative research found that some people lack an inward voice, termed “anendophasia”, impacting their verbal recollection and rhyme recognition. Individuals with internal voices struggled more with these tasks than those with inner voices.

The research demonstrates the distinctive cerebral practices of those who have anendophylaxis. Future research will examine how different mental processes and therapies are affected by this.

Important Facts:

    Anendophasia: Condition of having no internal words, shaping verbal memory and verse reputation.

  1. Findings of the study: Those who lack internal voices recall thoughts and rhymes more poorly.
  2. Mental Strategies: Individuals with anendophasia employ special strategies for problem- solving.

Origin: University of Copenhagen

Earlier, it was widely assumed that having an internal words had to be a human common. However, experts have realized that not everyone who has this practice has this knowledge in recent years. &nbsp,

People describe living without an inside voice as time-consuming and challenging because they must devote a lot of time and effort to translating their ideas into words, according to doctorate and scholar Johanne Nedergrd from the University of Copenhagen.

Some people claim to believe in photographs before using those images to express their feelings in terms. Some people claim that their brains are well-functioning computers that simply do not communicate with one another orally and that their connections to loudspeakers and microphones are unique.

” And those who claim that something verbal is happening inside of their heads typically define it as words without noise. ” &nbsp, &nbsp,

harder to remember rhymes and thoughts

Johanne Nedergård and her partner Gary Lupyan from the University of Wisconsin- Madison are the first researchers in the world to check whether the lack of an inward voice, or&nbsp, anendophasia&nbsp, as they have coined the state, has any consequences for how these people fix problems, for instance how they perform linguistic memory tasks.

One study examined whether there was a difference between their ability to remember language input and one about their ability to find rhyme words in subjects who reported experiencing either a high or low inner voice level in daily life.

The participants in the first experiment were asked to recall words that were similar either phonetically or spellingically, such as”” bought””, caught””, taut “and” wart”. &nbsp,

It will be challenging for everyone, but we speculated that it might be even more challenging if you lack an inner voice because you must repeat the words to yourself in your head to remember them, Johanna Nedergaard explains and expands:” It will be a task that will be challenging for everyone, but our hypothesis was that it might be even more difficult if you do n’t have an inner voice.”

The participants who had no internal voices were significantly less effective at recalling the words, according to this theory.

Similar to an assignment, where the students had to determine whether a pair of pictures, such as those of sock and clock, contained words that rhyme.

It is also crucial to be able to repeat the words in this area to compare their sounds and determine whether they rhyme. ” &nbsp, &nbsp,

There were no differences between the two groups in the two experiments conducted by Johanne Nedergaard and Gary Lupyan, who examined the role of the inner voice in distinguishing between figures that are very similar and switching quickly between different tasks.

Despite the fact that previous studies have suggested that these kinds of experiments involve both language and the inner voice.

” People who lack an inner voice may have just picked up other techniques,” they say. Some people, for instance, said they tapped their middle fingers when doing something else, and their index fingers when doing something else, according to Johanna Nedergaard. &nbsp,

The findings of the two researchers ‘ study were just published in the article” Not everyone has an inner voice: Behavioural consequences of anendophasia” in the psychological science journal.

Does it make a difference?

Johanne Nedergaard claims that ordinary conversations will not be able to distinguish the verbal differences found in their experiments. Does having no inner voice have any practical or behavioral significance, then?

We have only just begun to study it, so the short answer is that we simply do n’t know. However, we do believe that having an inner voice in a field like therapy, where you can identify and change harmful thought patterns. In this process, having an inner voice may be very important.

Johanne Nedergaard, who wants to continue her research to determine whether other language areas are impacted if you do n’t have an inner voice, says it’s still uncertain whether how people respond to various types of therapy. &nbsp, &nbsp, &nbsp,

” The experiments where we observed differences between the groups were about sound and, in our opinion, being able to hear the words for themselves. She concludes that she would like to study whether it is because they simply do not think in a linguistic way like most people do or because they simply do not experience the sound side of language. &nbsp, &nbsp, &nbsp,

About the study

Johanne Nedergård’s and Gary Lupyan’s study comprised almost a hundred participants, half of whom experienced having very little inner voice and the other half very much inner voice.

The participants were subjected to four experiments, e. g. remembering words in sequence and switching between different tasks.

The study has been published in the scientific journal&nbsp, Psychological Science.

Johanne Nedergård and Gary Lupyan have dubbed the condition of having no inner voice anendophasia, which means without an inner voice.

About this news about memory and anendolescence

Author: Carsten Munk Hansen
Source: University of Copenhagen
Contact: Carsten Munk Hansen – University of Copenhagen
Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

Original Research: Closed access.
Not Everybody Has an Inner Voice: Behavioral Consequences of Anendophasia” by Johanne Nedergård et al. Psychological Science


Not Everybody Has an Inner Voice: Behavioral Consequences of Anendophasia

It is commonly assumed that inner speech—the experience of thought as occurring in a natural language—is a human universal.

Recent evidence, however, suggests that the experience of inner speech in adults varies from near constant to nonexistent.

We propose a name for a lack of the experience of inner speech—anendophasia—and report four studies examining some of its behavioral consequences.

We found that adults who had high inner speech levels ( N&nbsp, = 46 ) and low verbal working memory levels ( N&nbsp, = 47 ) had lower performance and difficulty making rhyme judgments.

Task-swimming performance and categorical effects on perceptual judgments were unrelated to differences in inner speech, which were previously linked to endogenous verbal cueing.